Datasets
Buyer room
SUPPORT.CLEVER.COMManage supplier listing
Clever Inc. — Consented, curriculum-scoped edtech usage telemetry harvested through the Clever Plus browser extension on district-managed Chromebook and Windows devices. For each app the district has listed, it records the percentage of students and of teachers who used it and average active session time per user, sliced by school, grade and time window (7 / 28 days / this school year / last school year), with apps classified by provenance (district-added, Clever Library, or other). Because Clever is also the rostering and single-sign-on layer, every usage record is joinable to authoritative …
supplier index read from their site
Consented, curriculum-scoped edtech usage telemetry harvested through the Clever Plus browser extension on district-managed Chromebook and Windows devices. For each app the district has listed, it records the percentage of students and of teachers who used it and average active session time per user, sliced by school, grade and time window (7 / 28 days / this school year / last school year), with apps classified by provenance (district-added, Clever Library, or other). Because Clever is also the rostering and single-sign-on layer, every usage record is joinable to authoritative enrollment structure — school, grade, teacher-of-record, class roster — which is the attribute no extension-only instrument can attach. Reported users are explicitly those synced to Clever, running the extension, actively using a listed app, and holding a Clever-associated account.
From 4 yearsCoverage Information TechnologyAsset class Equities
Sample, licence terms, pricing and eval results when Clever Inc. publishes them. Until then, discover alternatives today with a 7-day trial.
Start 7-day trial →What buyers ask about Clever Inc., answered from this page.
Clever Inc. — Consented, curriculum-scoped edtech usage telemetry harvested through the Clever Plus browser extension on district-managed Chromebook and Windows devices. For each app the district has listed, it records the percentage of students and of teachers who used it and average active session time per user, sliced by school, grade and time window (7 / 28 days / this school year / last school year), with apps classified by provenance (district-added, Clever Library, or other). Because Clever is also the rostering and single-sign-on layer, every usage record is joinable to authoritative …
Clever Inc. offers (Alternative, Fundamental, Reference) — Modest by design and this is the key commercial caveat. Only listed edtech apps on extension-equipped devices are counted, so the corpus is on the order of thousands of apps x thousands of schools x grades x school-year periods — millions of aggregate metric rows, not billions of events. Illustrative density from the vendor's own example: a single school reporting 984 students and 97 teachers, with one app used by 4% of students for an average of 10 minutes across a full school year. Long-tail apps will frequently round to zero, so sparsity, not volume, is the constraint..
The strongest fit is education-technology market intelligence with an endorsement dimension: which tools reach students versus teachers, how deeply, in which grades, and crucially whether a tool was district-selected or arrived unsanctioned — a governance signal no raw-traffic source provides. Also: curriculum-aligned engagement time by subject and grade for instructional design; edtech vendor benchmarking and lead-scoring against a rostered population; device-OS mix tracking in classrooms; teacher-vs-student digital-role asymmetry research; longitudinal school-year adoption curves from the fixed year-over-year windows; and as clean, consented negative data — apps with rostered access but near-zero usage — for training recommendation and attention models on genuine disengagement.
The data is with 4 years of history.
Clever Inc. has not added their own details yet. Not yet on file:
Coverage spans US; Application Software; alternative, fundamental, reference; equities.