Entitlementrisk

District-level entitlement risk and political intelligence for US real estate development, built by aggregating city, open and proprietary datasets: for each city district a 12-month view of comparable entitled projects with the approval process and fee schedule that applied, the negotiated conditions and potential pitfalls, plus a genuinely non-obvious political layer — elected-official voting records on land-use matters, stakeholder and public-comment sentiment, organised advocacy/NIMBY constituent identification, next-election timing, and historic approval patterns. Delivered as a scored risk report covering 5 comparable projects per district.

Open buyer room →

Sample

Brickroad customers

Sample this dataset before you buy it.

Your sourcing agent asks Entitlementrisk and files the sample in your catalog — private to you.

Start 7-day trialNothing is charged until the trial ends.

Coverage

Universe, instruments and categories.

Industry: Real Estate ServicesProfessional Services
Instruments: equities
Categories

Dataset card

Type: not stated
Format: Multimodal — analyst-authored PDF risk reports with embedded structured scoring subscores, charts and analytics, assembled from city, open and proprietary data. No API, bulk export or machine-readable feed is offered; the delivery unit is a report, not a dataset.
Volume: Modest by design: base reports each cover 5 comparable entitled projects within one city district over a rolling 12-month window, so volume equals 5 projects x districts x reports produced. No total report, district or project count is published. The compounding asset is the accumulated political and outcome annotation across every report the 6-person team has produced since launch, which is not disclosed and could be substantial.
Users: ~20-150 subscribers (inferred: a 6-person consultancy selling subscription reports at per-project scope to developers and investors across top US metros — a boutique advisory client list, not a software user base)
History: not stated
Update frequency: not stated
Growth: Mature-niche / slow — a 6-person team, a 'Patent Pending' marking on the methodology, and a Silicon Valley base with a static single-page product site suggest an established boutique that sells steadily rather than a venture-scaled growth company
Launched: est. 2018-2022 (inferred: no copyright or founding date appears on the page; bounded above by the existence of a mature branded product with a patent-pending methodology and a settled 6-person team, and below by the modern CloudFront-hosted site with no pre-2018 press trace found)
Delivery: not stated
Entity mapping: not stated
Sample: not stated
Point-in-time: not stated
Licence: not stated

supplier index read from their site